The estate's energy, carbon and climate exposure — site by site, with its confidence.
Benchmark each site's energy use and rank the measures by payback, see which buildings an EPC deadline will catch, estimate operational and value-chain emissions, score the climate risk and track CSRD readiness datapoint by datapoint.
Figures are estimates from standard factors, each shown with its basis — a starting point for your adviser and auditor, not an assured report.
From kilowatt-hours to the sustainability report — on the same site data.
The energy audit feeds the carbon footprint and the EPC review, commute data adds to the emissions, and the climate risk and CSRD readiness sit on the same portfolio.
More about Energy audit ↓
More about EPC compliance ↓
More about Carbon footprint ↓
More about Scope 3 estimation ↓
More about Climate risk ↓
More about CSRD readiness ↓
What each step takes in, does and hands on
Sustainability numbers for an estate are usually assembled once a year from whoever has the bills. Every step below works from the same site data instead. Here is what you bring, what each step does and what you get out.
Energy audit
Which buildings use more energy than they should, what that costs, and which measures pay back first.
| Site | kWh / sqm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| Stockholm HQ | 118 | Good |
| Göteborg | 142 | Typical |
| Uppsala | 228 | Poor |
Portfolio 145 kWh/sqm. LED lighting and BMS controls pay back in about three years.
You bring
- Annual energy per site and fuel — electricity, gas, district heating and cooling, oil
- Area and building type
- Optionally energy cost, renewable share and a reduction target
What it does
- Computes energy per sqm per site against a benchmark for the building type
- Splits emissions by fuel using country grid factors
- Estimates cost from default tariffs when none is entered
- Shows what running above benchmark costs
- Ranks eight measures — LED, BMS, controls, insulation, glazing, heat pump, solar, sub-metering — by saving, capex and payback
- Draws the path to your target, with a narrative written by AI
What you get
- Sites ranked by energy use
- Measures in payback order
- A trajectory to the target
EPC compliance
Which buildings a minimum energy standard will catch, and when — while there is still time to upgrade or plan an exit.
One F-rated site is at risk when F is banned in 2033 — deadlines differ by country; check with your adviser.
You bring
- The energy rating per site
- The country, for its deadlines
- Optionally a target rating and lease clauses
What it does
- Sets each site against its country's ladder of deadlines, marking those still only planned
- Rates each site compliant, at risk or non-compliant
- Estimates upgrade cost per grade step
- Flags sites without a rating as hidden exposure, and exemptions such as listed buildings
- Writes the review and priorities with AI — advisory, to check with your adviser
What you get
- Share of sites compliant
- A site-by-deadline matrix
- Upgrade priorities with timing
Carbon footprint
What the estate emits in operation, by scope and by site — the baseline every reduction target is measured from.
- Scope 1 35
- Scope 2 230
- Scope 3 (operational) 410
You bring
- Energy use, from the energy audit
- Refrigerant types and amounts
- Waste, water and average commute
What it does
- Computes scope 2 from energy with country grid factors
- Estimates scope 1 refrigerant leakage from global-warming potentials
- Adds operational scope 3 from commuting, waste and water
- Shows each site's share
- Sets out a reduction roadmap, written by AI
What you get
- Emissions by scope
- A per-site table
- Reduction targets
Scope 3 estimation
A first, honest estimate of the value chain behind the estate — with the confidence of each number shown, so you know where better data matters.
| Category | tCO2e | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Purchased services | 310 | Medium |
| Fit-out and IT | 260 | Low |
| Business travel | 150 | Medium |
| Leased assets | 60 | Low |
About 780 tCO2e. Fit-out has the lowest confidence — better data there moves the total most.
You bring
- Spend on services
- Fit-out area and age
- IT spend and business travel
- The landlord's share of the building
What it does
- Models four categories: purchased services, fit-out and IT, business travel and leased assets
- Spreads fit-out and IT over their life
- Rates each category's confidence high, medium or low
- Writes the narrative with AI
What you get
- A value-chain estimate
- Where better data would matter most
- A basis for supplier conversations
Climate risk
Which sites are exposed to which hazards, and how the transition could hit the portfolio — scored the same way for every site.
| Site | Top hazard | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Göteborg | Flooding | 4 / 5 |
| Malmö 2 | Flooding | 4 / 5 |
| Stockholm HQ | Extreme heat | 2 / 5 |
Scored from country baselines you can adjust, under a 2 °C scenario.
You bring
- The sites and their locations
- What you know locally — flood maps, past events
- A warming scenario
What it does
- Scores eight physical hazards — flooding, heat, storms, wildfire, sea level, rising temperature, water stress, subsidence
- Scores four transition risks — regulation, technology, market, reputation
- Starts from country baselines you can adjust per site
- Compares scenarios of 1.5 °C, 2 °C and 3 °C or more
- Suggests adaptation actions, with AI
What you get
- A portfolio heat map
- The exposed sites, first
- Adaptation actions
CSRD readiness
How close you are to reporting under CSRD, datapoint by datapoint — and what to do first.
- P1Complete ESRS 2 general disclosures
- P2Name an owner for S1 workforce data
- P3Confirm materiality for E3 water
You bring
- Which datapoints are material
- How far along each one is
- Your first reporting year
What it does
- Lists about eighty ESRS datapoints across general disclosures, environment, social and governance
- Computes readiness as completed over material
- Flags datapoints that are commonly missed
- Lists quick wins first
- Writes a roadmap to the first report, with AI
What you get
- Readiness in per cent
- The gaps, by standard
- A roadmap to the first report
The difference between a sustainability report and a plan for the estate
From the sites themselves
Energy, ratings and emissions sit on each site, next to its lease and cost — so a poor building shows up in the same place as its break date.
Site by siteEstimates, labelled as such
Every figure shows the factor behind it and how confident it is. AI writes the narrative; the numbers are computed.
TransparentOne set of data, every question
The energy audit feeds the footprint and the EPC review, and the same portfolio carries the climate risk and the CSRD work.
One sourceThe people who answer for the estate's footprint
A baseline you can build on
Emissions by scope and site, with their confidence, and CSRD readiness datapoint by datapoint.
Which buildings to fix or leave
Energy above benchmark, EPC deadlines and climate exposure next to each site's lease events.
What it costs and when
The cost of running above benchmark, upgrade capex per grade and measures ranked by payback.
Read the Workplacer product story
What Workplacer is, the value it creates, and how the platform fits together — in brief or in full. Read it online or download the PDFs.
Know what the estate uses, emits and is exposed to.
Send us a year of energy data for your sites. We will benchmark them and show you the measures that pay back first.